Clearing up a bit of syntactic ambiguity. For the End of Session move, should the first option be parsed as:

Clearing up a bit of syntactic ambiguity. For the End of Session move, should the first option be parsed as:

Clearing up a bit of syntactic ambiguity. For the End of Session move, should the first option be parsed as:

1) Explain who made you feel welcome; [give Influence to that character] and [clear a condition or mark potential].

OR

2) Explain who made you feel welcome; [give Influence to that character and clear a condition] or [mark potential].

Or, put plainly: do you always give influence to someone and then pick between clearing a condition and marking potential, or is clearing a condition coupled with giving influence and you can either pick that duo or mark potential instead?

I’ve been reading it the second way, but I suspect I might be wrong.

2 thoughts on “Clearing up a bit of syntactic ambiguity. For the End of Session move, should the first option be parsed as:”

  2. I’ve been playing it as #1.  It makes more sense that way: if X makes you feel welcome, then you represent your deepening connection to X via influence, and the feeling of welcome via growth or healing.  So you can’t get the growth or healing w/out the connection.

Comments are closed.