So, we had a really good first session!
So, we had a really good first session! A Transformed, a Doomed, a Protege, an Outsider and the Legacy, in the future of an old superhero setting we played in for a long, long campaign. It was great!
The Legacy (Icarus) was in a fight against a plant-controlling woman named Rose Red with the Outsider (Lava Lass) and the Transformed (Kaiju). When Icarus took a powerful blow defending Lava Lass from a monstrous tooth-flower, he chose to lash out verbally at a team mate (he didn’t see the ; there in the description, but this isn’t about that).
I was like, “Sure! How are you doing it?” And he jumped in as Icarus, shouting “Do something! Don’t just stand there, come on! What the hell are you doing?! Why are you so useless?!!” and I was like, oh, use Directly Engage! So Icarus did and got a 10. Then, Kaiju defended Lava Lass, sticking up for her, giving Icarus an 8 instead. He chose to “Resist or avoid her blows” so that she couldn’t respond (or if she did he didn’t care), but she wasn’t intimidated by him. This was a great moves spiral that took the focus of the fight off of Rose Red and the vine monsters and onto the interpersonal teen drama, so I loved it! It helped push the hard move from Protege’s 2 on the Team Roll to enter the combat (Convey to him his mistakes).
After Rose Red escaped, it ended up with Lava Lass taking a powerful blow from Icarus telling the Doomed “At least you did something– not like LAVA LASS OVER HERE” in earshot of her– !! It was super amazing. I am loving the system and how it can effortlessly switch gears from superheroics to teen drama.
Now, the question:
Later the PCs told me they didn’t like that arguing was Directly Engaging and they don’t think it works. I think it does! Resisting their blows, creating an opportunity, taking something from them, frightening or impressing, it’s a shouting match! And that’s what happened right there. But they don’t think that Danger is the stat for arguing, but Superior, so the whole thing doesn’t work. I was thinking that a lot of arguments I’ve had have been solved by not who was the smartest or the smuggest but by the loudest! The other person’s implied or overt anger steers the argument faster and harder than actually being right.
What do you guys think?