I did a first round of modifications to my Thrillseeker playbook and have a second draft up now.

I did a first round of modifications to my Thrillseeker playbook and have a second draft up now.

I did a first round of modifications to my Thrillseeker playbook and have a second draft up now.

Thanks to David Reichgeld and Felix Girke especially for their input and comments.

I am happy with any feedback. So please take a look and leave a comment if you want.

Not 100% sure about the stat blocks and advancements yet.

Of course the moves are not perfect yet either. But I think I have a core of ideas for each move that can be interpreted and worked with in a different way.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/10mQvFqzoi2G2Pvz7MW5CO79SNpSqygveYdMdP7ijg3k/edit?usp=sharing

4 thoughts on “I did a first round of modifications to my Thrillseeker playbook and have a second draft up now.”

  1. Ok, I could be totally on the wrong path with this one and actually it is not really relevant, but I will bring it up. Please keep in mind, that I didn´t get an opportunity to drink my first coffee this morning.

    Most of the existing official playbooks are named with an adjective derived noun. How about “The Thrilled” or “The Thriller” as a playbook name?

    Jeeez, i need more coffee.

    Btw. I blame Fred Hicks and Michael Sands for triggering my Gamer OCD with “TheSpell-Slinger” breaking that rule 🙂

  2. Well, naming them like that is not a hard and fast rule, just the way I named the first set.

    I have also done otherwise when I couldn’t think of a good name (see: the Hard Case), and I think here Thrillseeker sounds better than your alternatives, because it gives you a better idea what the character is about.

  3. I think thrillseeker comes pretty close to the core of what I think the character is about.

    Could be the “Risky” but that does not sound good either.

    But with this existing (and the Hard-Case) you don’t have to OCD any longer. There is more than one exception.

Comments are closed.