Well, this was too fabulous not to share.
Well, this was too fabulous not to share. I recently started a game, and one of my players created a “Feel Wheel” of all the characters opinions of eachother. (all credit to that player, but it was too great not to share)
For the Outsider and Transformed they both have advancements that allow them to choose 2 new abilities from another…
For the Outsider and Transformed they both have advancements that allow them to choose 2 new abilities from another playbook, is there any reason that both of those abilities have to be chosen from the same playbook? Like does that somehow effect consistency or balance or tone?
Can you reject influence on the label shift that happens if someone gains influence on you while already having it?
Can you reject influence on the label shift that happens if someone gains influence on you while already having it? We’re having a bit of a disagreement in my group about this and were hoping for an official clarification.
Hey quick question, with the move “Physics?
Hey quick question, with the move “Physics? What physics?: When you unleash your powers to barrel through an insurmountable barrier, roll + Danger instead of + Freak” should one interpret it as basically a door/shield breaker or can it be seen more as a overcoming the impossible like time and space? Is it just more heavily context reliant? I ask cause a big inspiration for the bull is America Chavez and she basically punches open portals through dimensions to teleport and wanted to know if that sort of application far exceeds what the bull here should be doing.
So when will the softcover verssion of corebook arive to middle europe if i preorder?
So when will the softcover verssion of corebook arive to middle europe if i preorder? (i still dont have it yes i can acces the pdf…but the book will be nice addition
How have your tables handled it when the Doomed finally defeats their Nemesis?
How have your tables handled it when the Doomed finally defeats their Nemesis? The one time it happened with me, it coincided with the end of the campaign, so we didn’t need to figure anything out going forward. Curious how others have handled it, in case the situation arises again.
Would it be kosher to have a Doomed who was able to stave off their doom temporarily?
Would it be kosher to have a Doomed who was able to stave off their doom temporarily? For example, in a show I’m watching, there’s a hero who has to regularly eat a certain kind of monster to survive. (Fortunately, the villains use those monsters as minions.) Other examples could be a mutant who takes medicine to avoid the harmful side-effects of their mutation, or a demon who has to regularly attend church or get dragged back to Hell. (Side note: a devoutly religious hero whose powers stem from an unholy source sounds really interesting to me.)
I’m unsure about this because on the one hand, they are still being killed by their powers, it’s just that they have a way to delay the inevitable. On the other hand, they could theoretically keep stalling forever and never confront their doom. What do y’all think?
So I just want to double check something that the rules heavily imply but don’t straight up say:
So I just want to double check something that the rules heavily imply but don’t straight up say:
When you Directly Engage With a Threat and choose to take something from them, you get to pick what that is, correct?
A couple of quick questions:
A couple of quick questions:
If a player rolls a 6- with the “take a powerful blow” move, the GM has to make a move, like any other 6-?
When the GM marks the last condition of a villain, does that trigger the relative condition move?
So the Delinquent gets to add +1 to any two labels as a special advance.
So the Delinquent gets to add +1 to any two labels as a special advance. It seems powerful, and for a while I though it was unflavorful. But I just realized: Labels are about the PCs self image. And of course the delinquent can get an inflated self image. “Yeah, I’m the most dangerous and I’m the most superior. And I’m the biggest freak too!”
As a GM, I think I’d spend some time pushing the Delinquent’s best stats, hitting those extra conditions when they would shift up past a plus three and give them a condition. Not as mean as it seems, since the delinquent is good at avoiding and rejecting influence.
