Originally shared by Jay Iles
As part of my ‘system basics’ section in my current book, I thought I’d chart out the flow of the conversation, moves, gm reactions. Here’s the current version – comments/feedback/reactions welcome!
As part of my ‘system basics’ section in my current book, I thought I’d chart out the flow of the conversation,…
As part of my ‘system basics’ section in my current book, I thought I’d chart out the flow of the conversation,…
This is absolutely brilliant. I love this chart.
Sounds good.
it is possible to recover it to translate it into French ?
Nice, but… If it’s a combat/action move, it has immediate repercussions no ?
The thought is more… if the action a player describes their character taking would cause something to happen before they completed their action, the gm gets to make a move. A good example is a fighter trying to charge down a trapped hallway and stab a kobold. Because it’s been established that the hallway is trapped, the GM gets to make a move with those traps before the fighter gets a chance to trigger Hack and Slash.
Jay Iles Perhaps it shoud be reformulate as “Has it been established that this action require immediate GM reaction?”
Very nice and helpful! One thing I was wondering, though: from the “Is this a move?”-box, the “no” – should it lead to “Ground the results in the fiction”?
Also, sorry to be nitpicky, but there’s a small typo: repurcussions -> repercussions.